Anson, C., Moxley, J. Lejen, D., Finnegan, D., Warnsby, A., and Kauppinen, A. 2015. Theorizing community rubrics: limits, research, and case studies. In EATAW 2015: 8th Biennial Conference of the European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing. (Tallinn University, Estonia, June 15-17, 2015).
ACT. 2013. The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2013. ACT National Report: ACT Inc., Aurora, CO. chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://www.act.org/research/policymakers/cccr13/pdf/CCCR13-NationalReadinessRpt.pdf.
Anson, C., Moxley, J. Lejen, D., Finnegan, D., Warnsby, A., and Kauppinen, A. 2015. Theorizing community rubrics: limits, research, and case studies. In EATAW 2015: 8th Biennial Conference of the European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing. (Tallinn University, Estonia, June 15-17, 2015).
College Board. 2013. 2013 SAT Report on College and Career Readiness. College Board Report. The College Board, New York, NY.
Dixon, Z., & Moxley, J. M. 2013. Everything is illuminated: what big data can tell us about teacher commentary. Assessing Writing 18 (2013), 241-256. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.08.002.
Langbehn, K., McIntyre, M. & Moxley, J. M. 2013. Re-mediating writing program assessment. In Digital Writing Assessment & Evaluation. Heidi A. McKee and Danielle Nicole DeVoss, Eds. Computers and Composition Digital Press, Logan, UT. http://ccdigitalpress.org/dwae/13_langbehn.html.
Moxley, J. 2015. My Reviewers: The development and user-centered design of an internally-produced document review, assessment, and e-portfolio tool. In The ACM Special Interest Group on the Design of Communication (ACM SIGDOC) (Limerick, Ireland, July 16-17, 2015). http://sigdoc.acm.org/conference/2015/.
Moxley, J. 2015. Peer review and document review in STEM courses. In ProCOMM 2015. IEEE International Professional and Communication Conference. (Limerick, Ireland, July 12-15, 2015). http://pcs.ieee.org/procomm2015/.
Moxley, J. M. 2014. Using digital tools to facilitate and assess the development 21st century literacy competencies in scientific and technical writing programs. In Conference on Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication. (University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, September 25-27, 2014).
Moxley, J. 2015. Using digital tools to improve feedback on student writing, peer review, and writing program assessment. In 21st Century Academic Forum at Harvard. Teaching, Learning, and Research in the 'Just Google It' Age. (Harvard, MA, March 9, 2015).
Moxley, J. & Eubanks, D. In Press. On keeping score: instructors' vs. students' rubric ratings of 46,689 essays. WPA: Writing Program Administration. (In Press).
Moxley, J., Ross, V., Lane, S., Donahue, C., Anson, C., and Rudniy, A. 2015. NSF PRIME: the role of instructor and peer feedback in improving the cognitive, interpersonal, and intrapersonal competencies of student writers in STEM courses. NSF Grant. Award number: 1544239.
National Research Council. 2013. Frontiers in Massive Data Analysis. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Programme for International Student Assessment. 2012. Programme for International Student Assessment Results from PISA 2012: United States. OECD. chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-results-US.pdf
Tackitt, A., Moxley, J., and Eubanks, D. 2015. Signifying scores: instructor rating as an assessment measure. Assessing Writing. (Submitted).